in InDesign, or it can be automatically adjusted by the app (as e.g. It can be user-defined (as most of the settings you have are), like it is e.g. There are so many things I don't understand, so I'll end said in Printer marks do not work correctly: Still, the Bleed, Slug settings don't seem to work properly to me. Why are the settings separated in different places? On the other hand, there is Margins in Document Setup> Artbord> Format. I don't understand why Bleed and Slug are elements of Margin. However, the content is Bleed and Slug settings. In VS there is a Margins setting in Document Setup. This is a reference diagram of how they are used in the Japanese printing industry. Other names and position settings are different here and there. The Bleed part of the photo is cut off, but it should be filled. Unfortunately, the illustrations here lack clarity. It seems that this is not necessary in Europe and the United States, but it is essential in Japan. The ID further defines the bleed cut-off marks as "Bleed marks". Of course, the names are different, but the program works fine. I don't think so, but I'm worried that VS developers might have this confusion. It is common in industry that specifications differ depending on the country, organization, and manufacturer. In my opinion, the cause may be the crosstalk of the program due to confusion with the print term, typesetting term, and postscript definition.Įspecially, I have a problem in interpreting "crop" and "mrgin". What is the reason why the mark is not in the specified position? It becomes a Crop mark, but Bleed disappears. The difference between Bleed mark and Crop mark will be described later. Set the following document as an example.ĭocument Setup: Margins = 0mm, Slug = 15mm Here's an example of what hasn't been fixed. It is regrettable because it is an essential function as a product.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |